Contents
The welding parameter tables give you a starting point for flat butt welds. Most real-world jobs are not flat butt welds. When you change the joint geometry, you change how the heat distributes and where the melt pool needs to go — and that means adjusting the parameters.
This guide explains the logic behind those adjustments. All base parameter values in Section 7 come from GWEIKE / WSX production tests. The adjustment guidance in Sections 3–6 represents general engineering practice for laser welding — verify on test pieces for your specific joint configuration before production.
Why Joint Type Changes Everything
In a flat butt weld, the laser beam hits a straight seam between two flat surfaces. The heat goes into one narrow zone, the melt pool forms symmetrically on both sides of the seam, and the scan pattern oscillates across the joint centerline. This is the simplest case — and it is what all the numbers in the parameter table are optimized for.
Change to a T-joint, and suddenly the heat has to reach two surfaces at a right angle. The laser beam that was perfectly centered on a seam now has to cover a corner. Some energy hits the vertical face, some hits the horizontal face — and if the balance is wrong, one face melts well while the other barely fuses. A lap joint adds a different challenge: the heat has to penetrate through the top plate entirely to reach the bottom one.
None of these scenarios need completely different parameters. They need targeted adjustments to three or four variables. Knowing which variables to change — and in which direction — is what this guide covers.
Three Joint Types — What They Are and Where They Are Used
Edge-to-edge in one plane
Two pieces placed side by side, welded along the seam. The tightest fit-up requirement of all three joints. Typical uses: sheet metal panels, pipe end-to-end joins, structural flat plate joins.
Vertical piece meets flat base
One plate stands perpendicular to another. The weld fills the corner root on one or both sides. Very common in fabrication: frames, brackets, furniture, enclosures, cabinet corners.
One plate overlapping another
Two plates overlap and the laser welds through the top into the bottom. The most forgiving joint for fit-up. Typical uses: thin-sheet assemblies, brackets, reinforcing plates, structural overlaps.
Butt Joint — Using the Parameter Table Directly
The butt joint is the reference geometry for all the parameters in Section 7. No adjustment multipliers apply — use the table values directly. That said, there are two details specific to butt welding that the parameter table does not spell out.
Fit-up requirement: the tightest of all three joints
For butt welding, the gap between the two pieces should not exceed approximately 10% of the material thickness. For 1mm plate this means ≤0.1mm; for 3mm plate ≤0.3mm. The scan width (2–5mm in the parameter table) gives the beam an oscillating footprint that helps bridge very small gaps, but consistent fit-up is far more reliable than counting on scan width to compensate for joint preparation.
If the gap is inconsistent along the length of the joint — wider in some spots than others — the weld quality will vary accordingly. Uniform clamping and properly prepared edges matter more for butt welding than for any other joint type.
What the scan parameters mean for butt welding
The parameter table includes scan frequency (Hz) and scan width (mm). For butt welding, the scan width defines how wide the oscillating beam sweeps across the seam. A wider scan width makes the weld bead wider and more tolerant of small gaps or minor misalignment — but it also dilutes the heat slightly, which can reduce penetration. The values in the table are balanced for the stated thickness. If your fit-up is consistently clean, you can narrow the scan width slightly to increase penetration. If fit-up is variable, the table values give better consistency.
T-Joint and Fillet Weld — How to Adjust the Parameters
A T-joint is where most operators run into problems when switching from butt welding. The geometry looks simple — one plate standing on another — but the laser now has to deliver heat to two surfaces that meet at a corner, not one flat seam.
The core problem: heat balance across two surfaces
In a butt weld, both pieces are in the same plane and receive heat symmetrically. In a T-joint, the vertical plate (web) faces the laser beam head-on while the horizontal plate (flange) is at an angle. If you use butt weld parameters unchanged, the top of the vertical plate absorbs too much energy while the corner root — where the actual joint strength lives — receives too little. The result is a weld with good appearance on top but poor or missing fusion at the root.
Three adjustments that address the T-joint geometry
1. Aim toward the root, not the top surface. The beam centerline and wire feed should be directed toward the corner root (the junction line between the two plates), not perpendicular to the top of the vertical plate. Angle the head 15–20° toward the flange to ensure the melt pool forms at the root.
2. Increase scan width by 20–30%. The wider oscillation ensures the beam sweeps across enough of both faces to create a joint that covers both surfaces. For a 2mm scan width butt weld, try 2.4–2.6mm for the T-joint. For a 4mm butt width, try 4.8–5.2mm.
3. Reduce travel speed by approximately 10–20%. Heat needs more time to distribute across two faces at a right angle than to penetrate straight down through a flat seam. Lower speed extends the melt pool dwell time at the root. Start at 85% of the butt weld run-length value and adjust from test results.
Single-side vs both-side T-joint welding
A single-side T-joint weld (one pass on one side of the corner) is adequate for many thin-sheet applications. For structural joints where strength is critical, a second pass on the opposite side produces a symmetrical cross-section and eliminates the stress concentration at the unwelded root. If doing two passes, the first pass should be the full adjusted parameters; the second pass typically uses 80–90% of the same parameters to avoid over-heating the already-welded first side.
Lap Joint — Focus Depth Is the Key Variable
Lap joints are in many ways the easiest laser welding geometry to achieve successfully. The fit-up tolerance is wider, the joint position is naturally stable, and it is harder to miss the joint centerline. But there is one variable that is specific to lap welding and critical to get right: where the focal point sits in the material stack.
Why standard focus position does not work for lap joints
The standard parameter table uses focus position 0 for stainless and carbon steel — meaning the focal point is at the material surface. For a butt weld, this is correct: you want maximum energy density at the top surface to start the melt pool, and it penetrates from there. For a lap joint, this means all the energy concentrates at the top surface of the upper plate. The upper plate may weld well while the lower plate barely fuses — producing a weld that looks complete from the outside but has almost no bond strength at the interface.
Setting focus for lap welding
For lap joints, lower the focus position to approximately one-third to one-half the upper plate thickness below the surface. For a 1mm upper plate, set focus to approximately –0.3 to –0.5mm (negative means below the surface for SS/CS). For a 2mm upper plate, try –0.7 to –1.0mm. This shifts maximum energy density deeper into the stack, ensuring the melt pool penetrates through to the lower plate.
The exact value depends on the upper plate thickness and the penetration depth needed. Run a cross-section test on a sample weld: cut through the weld, polish and etch, and inspect under a loupe or microscope to confirm fusion at the interface. A weld that looks good from the top may have zero interface fusion — this is the most common lap joint failure mode and it is invisible without sectioning.
Lap joint fit-up advantages
The gap tolerance for lap joints is significantly wider than butt welding — up to 0.3mm between the two plates is generally manageable, compared to ≤0.1mm for butt joints on 1mm material. Clamping requirements are also simpler: the overlapping geometry naturally keeps the plates aligned, and gravity often helps. This makes lap welding well-suited to production runs where butt joint preparation would be too time-consuming.
Parameter Adjustment Reference — Butt vs T-Joint vs Lap
The table below shows how each parameter changes from the butt weld baseline when switching to T-joint or lap joint geometry. All adjustments are starting-point recommendations based on general laser welding engineering practice — test on your specific material and thickness before production.
Swipe to view full table
| Parameter | Butt joint (baseline) | T-joint / Fillet | Lap joint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Travel speed | 100% (table value) | Reduce 10–20% Heat must distribute across two faces |
Same as butt, or reduce 5–10% |
| Peak power % | 100% (table value) | Same or increase 5% Adjust beam position first, not power |
Increase 5–10% Extra energy needed to penetrate two layers |
| Scan width | Table value | Increase 20–30% Cover both faces through the corner root |
Same as butt (or slightly narrower) |
| Scan frequency (Hz) | Table value | Same | Same |
| Focus position (SS/CS) | 0 (surface) | 0 (unchanged) Aim toward root — do not change focus |
–0.3 to –1.0mm (into upper plate) Depends on upper plate thickness |
| Focus position (Al) | +3 to +5mm | +3 to +5mm (unchanged) | +1 to +3mm (reduced positive) Bring focus slightly closer to surface |
| Wire feed speed | Table value | Reduce 10–15% Lower travel speed means more wire per mm |
Same as butt |
| Beam / wire aim point | Seam centerline | Toward corner root Angle head 15–20° toward base plate |
Top plate surface, above interface |
| Gap tolerance | ≤10% of thickness Tightest of all three joints |
≤15% of thickness Corner root provides some natural alignment |
≤0.3mm between plates Most forgiving of all three joints |
| Fit-up difficulty | Highest | Medium | Lowest |
Green = lower value than butt baseline. Red = higher value. Blue = same as butt baseline. All adjustments are starting-point references. The exact values depend on material, thickness, joint angle, and machine configuration. Always verify on test pieces.
Complete Welding Parameter Tables (1KW–3KW)
Swipe to view full table
| Thickness (mm) | Wire diam. (mm) | Wire speed (mm/s) | Peak power (%) | Scan freq. (Hz) | Scan width (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stainless steel — Focus: 0 mm | |||||
| 0.5 | — | — | 35% | 150 | 1.5 |
| 0.8 | 0.8 | 18 | 50% | 100 | 2.0 |
| 1.0 | 0.8 | 18 | 56% | 100 | 2.0 |
| 1.5 | 1.0 | 15 | 56% | 100 | 2.5 |
| 2.0 | 1.2 | 12 | 65% | 40 | 3.0 |
| 2.5 | 1.2 | 8 | 80% | 30 | 4.0 |
| 3.0 | 1.2 | 6 | 90% | 30 | 4.5 |
| Carbon steel — Focus: 0 mm | |||||
| 0.5 | — | — | 35% | 150 | 1.5 |
| 0.8 | 0.8 | 18 | 50% | 100 | 2.0 |
| 1.0 | 0.8 | 18 | 56% | 100 | 2.0 |
| 1.5 | 0.8 | 18 | 56% | 100 | 2.5 |
| 2.0 | 1.2 | 12 | 60% | 100 | 3.0 |
| 3.0 | 1.2 | — | 95% | 30 | 3.5 |
1KW has no aluminum data in the validated test records. At 0.5mm, wire is not used (autogenous weld). 3mm CS at 95% peak power is at the practical limit for 1KW — confirm penetration on a cross-section test before production.
Fit-Up and Fixturing — What the Parameter Table Assumes
Every number in the parameter table assumes well-prepared, tightly clamped joints. Laser welding does not correct for poor fit-up the way MIG or TIG welding can — the concentrated heat source has a small zone of influence, and gaps or misalignment outside the beam footprint simply do not get welded.
Edge preparation
For butt joints, sheared or laser-cut edges are adequate for thicknesses up to 3mm. For thicker material or where weld quality is critical, machined or ground edges give more consistent results. Edges should be clean, square, and free of oil, scale, or oxide. Aluminum in particular oxidizes quickly — weld within a few hours of cleaning for best results.
Clamping strategy by joint type
- Butt joints: Clamp both sides of the seam within 20–30mm of the joint. The clamps must hold the pieces at the same height — any step between the two surfaces creates an effective gap that the laser cannot bridge cleanly.
- T-joints: Clamp the base plate firmly first, then press the vertical plate into the corner root before clamping. Even small gaps at the root — if the vertical plate is held slightly off the base — result in poor root fusion that is invisible from outside.
- Lap joints: Use clamping or spot-tack welds at regular intervals to hold the plates in contact. The natural weight of the upper plate helps, but at higher speeds the plate can lift slightly at the weld front — clamp every 100–150mm for longer seams.
Thermal distortion management
Laser welding produces a narrow, deep heat-affected zone — much less distortion than TIG or MIG for the same joint. However, thin sheet still warps if not properly constrained. For thin stainless (≤1.5mm), backstep welding (welding in short segments in a direction opposite to the overall travel) reduces cumulative heat buildup. For aluminum, preheat the joint area to 80–100°C to reduce the thermal gradient — this reduces porosity and cracking tendency in alloys prone to hot cracking.
Troubleshooting by Joint Type
Butt joint: weld appears complete but breaks along the seam under load
Likely cause: Gap too large at some points. The oscillating beam produced a visible bead but did not achieve full fusion — the melt pools from each side did not unite at the joint centerline.
Fix: Improve fit-up first. Reduce gap to within 10% of material thickness. If fit-up is already correct, increase scan width by 0.5mm and reduce travel speed by 10%. Section a test weld to confirm the fusion profile is symmetric and reaches the full depth of the joint.
T-joint: weld looks good on top but lacks strength at the root
Likely cause: Beam aimed at the top of the vertical plate rather than the corner root. The visible bead is on the vertical plate face while the root remains unfused.
Fix: Tilt the welding head 15–20° toward the base plate so the beam centerline points at the root junction. Increase scan width by 20–30%. Section a test piece and inspect the root under magnification — look for a continuous fusion line connecting both plate faces at the corner. If root fusion is shallow but present, reduce travel speed by a further 10%.
T-joint: base plate burns through while vertical plate is barely fused
Likely cause: Head is aimed too far toward the base plate — the opposite of the previous problem. Too much energy reaches the flat base and not enough reaches the vertical face.
Fix: Reduce the tilt angle back toward vertical (aim closer to 10° rather than 20° from vertical). Increase scan width slightly so the beam covers more of the vertical plate face. Reduce peak power by 5% and re-test.
Lap joint: weld bead looks normal but peels cleanly at the interface
Likely cause: Focus position too high — the melt pool never reached the interface between the two plates. The upper plate welded to itself but the lower plate stayed cold.
Fix: Lower the focus position by 0.5mm increments until a cross-section test shows fusion at the plate interface. For 1mm upper plate, target focus at –0.3 to –0.5mm. For 2mm upper plate, try –0.7 to –1.0mm. Increase peak power by 5% if focus adjustment alone is insufficient. Always section test welds — interface fusion is invisible from the surface.
All joint types: porosity in aluminum welds
Likely cause: Surface oxide or moisture on the aluminum, insufficient shielding gas coverage, or too-rapid solidification that traps hydrogen. Aluminum absorbs hydrogen from atmospheric moisture extremely quickly.
Fix: Clean the aluminum surface immediately before welding — acetone followed by a stainless steel brush, then weld within one hour. Confirm nitrogen gas flow is ≥20 L/min and that the nozzle is positioned to fully cover the melt pool. Preheat the joint area to 80–100°C to slow solidification. For lap joints on aluminum, reduce travel speed by a further 10% to give hydrogen more time to escape before the pool solidifies.
Need help dialing in a specific joint or material?
Joint geometry, material grade, surface condition and fixturing all affect whether the parameter adjustments in this guide land in the right range for your application. If you are getting consistent failures on a specific joint type, our applications team can review your setup and suggest targeted adjustments.
Helpful to include: joint type, material and thickness, current parameter settings, a description of the failure (what the weld looks like vs what it should look like), and whether you have done a cross-section test.
FAQ
What is the maximum gap tolerance for laser butt welding?
The gap between the two pieces should generally not exceed 10% of the material thickness — so 0.1mm for 1mm plate and 0.3mm for 3mm plate. The oscillating scan pattern (scan width 1.5–5mm) helps bridge minor gaps, but consistent fit-up is more reliable than using scan width to compensate for poor joint preparation.
How do you adjust laser welding parameters for a T-joint?
Three adjustments: (1) Aim the beam toward the corner root rather than the top of the vertical plate — tilt the head 15–20° toward the base plate. (2) Increase scan width by 20–30% to cover both faces. (3) Reduce travel speed by 10–20% to allow heat to distribute across both surfaces. Verify on test pieces — the exact adjustment depends on material, thickness, and joint angle.
Can a 1KW or 2KW fiber laser weld lap joints?
Yes. Lap welding is generally more forgiving than butt welding because fit-up tolerance is wider. Set the focus position below the surface of the upper plate — roughly one-third to one-half the upper plate thickness below the top surface — to ensure the melt pool penetrates to the interface. Increase peak power by 5–10% compared to butt weld values. The 1KW and 1.5KW systems can reliably lap-weld stainless steel and carbon steel up to 2mm; 2KW–3KW extends this to 3–4mm.
Why does laser welding require tighter fit-up than TIG or MIG?
Laser welding uses a concentrated heat source with a very small spot size — typically 0.3–0.6mm at the workpiece. This precision is also its constraint: the laser cannot bridge a large gap the way a wider MIG or TIG arc can. The oscillating beam extends the effective weld width to 1.5–5mm, which helps significantly, but joint preparation still needs to be more precise than for arc welding processes.

